FxPro Spreads & Trading Costs — FxPro Malaysia 2026
What does trading actually cost at FxPro — and is the Standard or Raw+ account cheaper for you? Spreads, commission and the all-in cost per trade.
Open FxPro Account →Every figure on this page is the same for everyone; what differs is how many times a month you meet it. A style that opens and closes several positions in a session pays the round turn again and again, so the entry cost is close to the whole cost of trading. A style that places a few positions a month and lets them run meets the same figure a few times, and the rest of its bill is assembled somewhere else. At FxPro a EUR/USD trade costs about 1.2 pips — roughly $12 per standard lot — on the spread-only Standard account with no commission, or about 0.2 pips plus a $3.50-per-side commission (about $9 per round-turn lot) on the Raw+ account. Raw+ works out cheaper once the spread saving beats the commission — about 0.7 pips on a $10-per-pip major — which is why the answer to which account is cheaper belongs to your style rather than to the price list. Spreads are variable, so confirm the live figures in your platform before trading.
Real measured Raw+ spreads and cost
The median spread, all-in cost and how the spread compares with an independent interbank reference feed, measured on FxPro’s own MT5 Raw+ feed — first-hand, not advertised:
| Instrument | Median spread | All-in / lot | All-in (pips) | vs reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD | 0.2 pips | $9.00 | 0.9 pips | −0.09 pips |
| GBP/USD | 0.6 pips | $13.00 | 1.3 pips | +0.03 pips |
| AUD/USD | 0.4 pips | $11.00 | 1.1 pips | −0.26 pips |
| USD/CAD | 0.4 pips | $9.87 | 1.38 pips | −0.64 pips |
| USD/JPY | 0.3 pips | $8.90 | 1.4 pips | +0.14 pips |
| XAU/USD (Gold) | 15 pips | $22.00 | 22 pips | −40.2 pips |
‘All-in (pips)’ is also your break-even — the move needed to cover spread plus commission. ‘vs reference’ compares our measured spread with an independent interbank reference feed over the same hours; a negative number means FxPro’s spread was tighter. The round-turn cost is about $77.9 per $1,000,000 traded on EUR/USD. This page is the Standard-vs-Raw+ cost overview; for the live, hour-by-hour measured spread feed see our live spreads page.
How much a trade costs: Standard vs Raw+
| Instrument | Standard spread | Standard cost | Raw+ spread | Raw+ cost + comm | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD | 1.2 pips | $12.00 | 0.2 pips | $9.00 | Raw+ |
| GBP/USD | 1.5 pips | $15.00 | 0.4 pips | $11.00 | Raw+ |
| USD/CAD | 1.6 pips | $12.00 | 0.5 pips | $10.75 | Raw+ |
| USD/JPY | 1.3 pips | $9.10 | 0.3 pips | $9.10 | About equal |
Approximate cost for a round-turn standard lot (100,000 units), in USD. Raw+ / cTrader commission is $3.50 per lot per side ($7.00 round turn) on Raw+ and cTrader accounts. Pip values and spreads are variable — confirm live figures in your platform. Last updated 2026-06-20.
Which account is cheaper for you
Raw+ replaces a wider spread with a tighter spread plus a $7 round-turn commission, so it only pays off once the spread saving beats that commission — about 0.7 pips on a $10-per-pip major such as EUR/USD. If the Standard spread is more than roughly 0.7 pips wider than the raw spread, Raw+ is cheaper; if the gap is smaller (or you trade rarely), the Standard all-in spread can win. As a rule of thumb, frequent traders on liquid majors save with Raw+, while occasional traders often prefer Standard.
Open FxPro Account →Typical FxPro spreads (all instruments)
| Instrument | Standard spread | Raw spread |
|---|---|---|
| EUR/USD | 1.2 pips | 0.2 pips |
| GBP/USD | 1.5 pips | 0.4 pips |
| USD/CAD | 1.6 pips | 0.5 pips |
| USD/JPY | 1.3 pips | 0.3 pips |
| Gold (XAU/USD) | 2.5 pips | 1.0 pips |
| US 500 (S&P) | 0.4 pts | 0.4 pts |
Indicative spreads. Metals and indices use different contract sizes — see our gold page for XAU/USD costs.
How a spread becomes a cost
The spread is the gap between the buy and sell price of a contract for difference (CFD). You pay it on entry: spread (in pips) × the pip value of one lot equals your cost. On a Standard account that spread is your whole trading cost; on Raw+ you pay a tighter raw spread plus the $7 round-turn commission. Compare the two on our Raw+ account, MT4 and MT5 pages.
Your trade rate is the multiplier on this page
A cost table answers the question of how much per trade. The question that decides your year is how much per trade, times how many trades. That second number is not published by anyone, because it is a property of you: the count of round turns your style produces in a month. A style built on several entries a session generates hundreds of them; a style built on a few considered positions generates a handful. The same table, multiplied by two very different counts, produces two very different bills.
This is why the page deserves a close reading from one trader and a glance from another. Before comparing anything here, count the round turns you actually placed last month. If the count is large, the figures above are the main lever you control. If it is small, you are looking at a minor line and the lever is somewhere else.
What the fast styles and the slow styles each take from this page
Scalping and active intraday trading meet the entry cost on every position, several times a session, and never carry a trade past the close. For them the cost table is close to the complete cost of doing business, and the target has to be set against it every single time.
Swing trading pays the same entry cost, but only once for a position that then lives through several sessions: worth taking the cheaper entry, not worth agonising over. Position trading pays it once and then works from a different page entirely, because the round turn is a small event inside a much longer plan. That side is on our swap rates page, and the fill-by-fill side on live spreads.
Why the cheaper account is a property of the trader
The account comparison above has no universal answer, and that is not a hedge. Raw+ replaces part of the spread with a flat commission, so it rewards a style that collects the difference many times and penalises nothing except infrequency. Standard folds everything into one number, which is simpler to live with when the number is met rarely.
The useful consequence is that the tier follows the style rather than the other way round. If the way you trade changes - more entries and shorter holds, or fewer entries and longer holds - the answer to which account is cheaper changes with it, and it is worth asking again instead of treating the tier as settled. What the tier never changes is what a position costs after the close.
Cost the trading you do, not the trading you meant to do
The multiplier in every calculation on this page is your own frequency, and it is the number traders are least accurate about. Almost everyone plans fewer entries than they take. Boredom, a second look at a chart, a position re-entered after being stopped - each one is another round turn, and none of them appeared in the plan that made the account choice look obvious.
The practical remedy is to price the habit rather than the intention. Take the number of round turns your last few weeks actually produced, not the number the strategy calls for, and run the comparison above on that. If the two numbers are far apart, the more useful project is not a cheaper account but a tighter rule about when a trade is allowed to happen at all.
Which cost line each style should watch
| Style | Where most of the bill comes from | What is worth optimising |
|---|---|---|
| Scalping, several round turns a session | The entry cost, met on every position | The account tier and the instruments traded |
| Active intraday, a few round turns a session | The entry cost, still the largest line | Target size set against the round turn |
| Swing, positions held a few sessions | The entry once, then a plan measured in sessions | Which trades are allowed past the close |
| Position, weeks at a time | Almost entirely what it costs to stay in | Whether the trade is worth carrying at all |
Nothing in this table is a broker setting. It says which of the measured tables above, and which page of this site, carries most of your cost - the measured figures themselves are identical from one style to the next.
Frequently asked questions
I only place a few trades a month - does this page decide anything for me?
Is the Standard or Raw+ account cheaper for my style?
Does trading more often change which account wins, or only the size of the bill?
Does a style that holds positions for weeks care about the spread?
Are FxPro spreads fixed or variable?
Does FxPro charge a commission?
What is the typical EUR/USD spread at FxPro?
Where can I see what a trade will cost before I place it?
Reviews
Spreads get a thumbs up on the majors and oil — traders call them competitive and reckon orders fill fast. Gold's the sore spot: a few clock it swinging 30–45 pips, way wider than they'd like. The ECN account trades tighter but the commission stings, 'on the higher side.' Fine if you stick to majors — just eyeball the metals spread before you load up.
Worst withdrawal experience bad spread and it really messing with my stop loss I don't recommend them honestly not just to spoil there name but they should do something
I have to claim that I MAINLY satisfied with the services offered by the FxPro broker, but not completely.
Mixed feelings, supposedly top tier broker, but some spreads are rather high and within days of opening account message about dormant account fees.
Fast orders, fair spreads. Easy withdrawals. Stable fxpro platform. commissions for ecn account is on a higher side:-s
Awesome trading platform with unmatched speed of orders execution and tight spreads. I believe this combination is what helps traders earn profits.
I do prefer a raw account’ why! See spreads. Although when I started I liked the spreads in the standard account too but over time liked the idea of commission and near to zero spreads…