FxPro Raw+ Account — FxPro Malaysia 2026

What Raw+ actually delivers (measured)

What the Raw+ account actually delivered when we measured it on FxPro’s own MT5 feed:

• EUR/USD measured at a 0.2-pip median spread and about $9.00 all-in per standard lot.
• That breaks even in 0.9 pips, and the spread measured perfectly stable (stability ratio 1) — tight and steady enough to scalp.
• Across the majors the measured spread sat at or below an independent interbank reference feed (EUR/USD −0.1, AUD/USD −0.5, USD/CAD −0.7 pips).
• Market orders in our test filled in about 78 to 99 milliseconds with near-zero slippage and no rejects.
• Raw+ commission is tiered by order size, with a minimum on the smallest size:

First-hand from the live feed — full detail on our measured spreads and execution pages.

FxPro Raw+ at a glance

• Raw spreads from 0.0 pips on major pairs
• Commission of $3.50 per lot per side
• Built for frequent traders and scalpers
• Runs on MetaTrader 4 (cTrader offers a similar raw model)
• Contrasts with the Standard all-in-spread account

A flat fee meets a saving that repeats

The argument for Raw+ has a shape rather than a size. The commission is flat - $3.50 per lot per side - and it is charged whatever the market is doing. The saving is per position: whatever the wider all-in spread would have been, minus the raw one. Multiply both by the number of round turns your style produces and the account with the smaller total wins by a wider margin the more you trade.

Read the other way, the same sentence explains why the tier is a small matter for an infrequent trader. A flat fee met rarely is a rounding error, and a saving collected rarely is a rounding error too. Nothing about the account is wrong for that trader; it simply is not where the money is.

What the tier does not decide

Two large parts of the bill are untouched by the choice. What a position costs after the close is set per instrument and per direction, so no tier rescues a trade that is expensive to keep open. And the size of the move you are trading for is set by you: an entry cost a swing target absorbs without noticing can be a serious share of a scalp target, and a cheaper account narrows that gap without closing it.

So the account question is worth exactly as much as your turnover makes it worth. The measured entry side of both accounts is on our spreads and costs page, and trading conditions covers the limits a fast style meets on every order.

Choosing a tier for the style you actually have

The comparison is easy to run in the wrong direction - picking an account first and then trading in whatever way that account seems to reward. It is worth doing in the order that matches reality: count the round turns you placed last month, note which instruments they were on, and only then decide which pricing shape fits the pattern.

The same exercise repeated in six months can give a different answer, and that is not a contradiction. It is the point. The tier is a description of how you trade, and a description goes out of date when the trading does.

The tier chosen for a style you do not have yet

A common way to get this wrong is aspirational. An account designed for constant activity looks like the serious choice, so it gets picked by someone who then trades twice a month - and pays a per-trade fee for a frequency that never arrives. Nothing breaks; the pricing simply never gets the chance to pay for itself.

The reverse happens too, and costs more. A trader whose activity has quietly increased keeps the pricing chosen back when they placed a few trades a month, and the difference is now collected against them on every position. Both cases have the same cure: decide the tier from the trading you are doing now, and treat it as a decision with a review date rather than a permanent setting.

Reading your own style before reading the price list

1. Count the round turns a normal month of your trading actually produced, from memory of the last few months rather than from intention.
2. Note how long a typical position stayed open: minutes, hours, sessions or weeks.
3. If the count is high and the holds are short, the pricing shape you are being offered is the one that rewards you.
4. If the count is low or the holds run into weeks, expect the tier to be a minor line and look at what the positions cost to keep open instead.
5. Repeat the exercise whenever the way you trade changes - the answer is a description of a habit, not a permanent setting.

Nothing here needs a figure from the tables above. The inputs are your own trading frequency and holding period, which is what makes the answer personal.

Related FxPro pages